Woody points out that brain scans are useful for seeing how the brain functions during the speech of stutterers, but not in showing the "cause" of stuttering.
All the more, as someone else also pointed out, it would be very interesting to look at the patterns of those who claim to have to a large extent "recovered". If no difference from fluent speakers shows up, this would strengthen the notion that the scans only show behavior. If a difference shows up in "recovered" stutterers in spite of fluent speech, THAT would be interesting. Unfortunately neither occurrence, it seems to me, would prove or disprove a neurologic deficit, but it could add a piece to the puzzle.
I'd be glad to volunteer for a completely fluent performance with my head in the machine... (somebody please tell Luc).
The posts are based on my experience as life-long stutterer and professional scientist in areas of Biophysics and bio-inspired computing (NASA 1980-2020). I reached a point where my stutter is no longer an issue, and is normally undetectable, but I can still be caught by surprise instances. This is probably the best that can be expected for this stubborn syndrome.
Blog background
I have been deeply involved in sharing my understanding with fellow stutterers, speech and language pathologists and researchers, especially in the 90's. The older part of this blog reports some the discussions I was having on a professional list at that time. Most of the discussions are still relevant today.
I remained involved in the stuttering community, mostly as participant in activities of the National Stuttering Association (NSA), and occasional workshop leader. Since my retirement I have returned to writing, and I just developed an audio course on fluency improvement. A link for the course can be found in this blog, as well as posts based on more recent discussions I am having in a Stuttering Facebook group.
No comments:
Post a Comment